Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Yaesu FT-891 Review UPDATE: Sleeper of a Deal

Please note -- this is the UPDATED review. It may seem similar to an earlier review, which other blogs copied and posted, but this contains my longer-term experiences... (most recently updated May 2018):

You can think of the Yaesu FT-891 as the younger, and somewhat ditzy sister radio to the elder FT-857.  They differ in several ways, however -- most notably, the 891 lacks VHF/UHF.  Compared to the 857, the 891 is a cheap date that talks dirty.  The 891 can be a lot of fun, because she puts out.  She is less refined in some ways, but outperforms in others.  Her face smiles much wider than the aging 857, but the 891 missing a dedicated SWR meter, and selectable battery power readout is like missing front teeth.  Like the 857 you will need to push more buttons than other radios to get what you want, but once you do, she will surprise you.  Typical modern Yaesu genetics.

Depending on your needs, and budget, you may like the 891. Or, you may not.  Ultimately, I believe many hams will take her out, have some fun, and dump her for a long-term relationship with a more refined model. 

The 891's purposed role is in a vehicle. If you want a desktop rig, you can use it that way, but you might consider the Yaesu 450D a better all-around choice for marriage, and raising QSO's in your shack.  It just depends on your needs.  

For mountain portable ops, the 891 can work well enough, but if you aren't hiking a long distance, a 450D includes a tuner and a much better speaker.  Running headphones helps a lot, but my 891 needs coms headphones made for ham, which cut the highs -- regular audio headphones produce a high hiss that annoys. 

Quick look at Pros:

1. Price! Only Alinco rigs are less expensive, so best portable bang-for-the-buck out there.

2. 32-bit DSP found in FTDX series aids average RX stats to dig out signals better than rigs costing much more.

3. Slightly smaller than even the FT-857

4. Excellent power output, and strong cooling (see cons)

5. Menu items include wide Hz range Low/High cut RX bandwidth filter, like more expensive radios

6. Large display

7. Simple Panadapter (radio silent when scanning)

8. Five memories to save/play your CQ calls.

9. Works with ATAS system, and shares some attachments with FT-857

10. Yaesu misprinted the RX amp draw as 2a. It's only 1a draw.

11. Buttons are lit.

12.  THREE year Yaesu warranty!

Quick look at Cons:

1. Hissing sound makes rear mono audio port useless for headphones (front stereo port is better, but still present).

2. If using non-communications dedicated speaker or headphones, HISS in RX audio can be heard, if RF gain at full, and volume raised above 1/2. Assume you will need proper communications headphones, or expect some HISS. This noise is not heard through on-board speaker.  Remedy is to use a resistor to block the hiss, or specialized communications headphones.  I have found my Motorola HSN4038A external speaker also removes the HISS.  You can live with it, using normal headphones, but it is there.

3. Phase noise may bother others
 -- see ARRL test report and radioaficion link at bottom.  Close to your rig (field day) it can be an issue for others.  I experienced this.  Not a rig to bring to field day.

4. Voltage only viewable briefly at start-up.

5. Menus take some getting used to, but are better than FT-857

6. Audio is a bit blah through external speaker, but better than onboard audio.  * UPDATE: Speaker sounds greatly improved if you place something like a tuner on top of the FT-891.  Perhaps Yaesu designed it this way, on purpose -- as in how it would sound in a car.  Try it!

7. Fan noise gets loud in a 100w rag chew, but stays low enough at 50w output.

8. Not a "shack-in-the-box," because it lacks VHF/UHF.

9. No internal tuner, and Yaesu matching tuner is both expensive, and only matches 3.0 to 1. (Get LDG brand)

10. ALC can get a little wild, if set to average much above half.

11. Some user settings, like signal bandwidth, return to default, when switching between bands.

12. Bug info update, per Facebook 891 forum:  "...many people have experienced the clicking [beeping?] when using CAT and a USB cable. It seems to be related to the Monitor function. You ALMOST eliminate the clicking by going to MON in the quick menu, and reducing the MON volume to zero. The clicking happens even if MON is not enabled. So, reduce the MON level even if you don't enable the Monitor function.  Newer radios may not suffer from this issue.  Mine does, but not as bad as another documented issue.  My take:  Avoid this rig for digital work.

* May 2018 caveat:  There is talk that some people buying the latest FT-891 are not experiencing the clicking.  There was also another report I read that Yaesu repaired and replaced multiple internals on one ops radio, to resolve the clicking issue.  It is possible that Yaesu has finally acknowledged this issue, and is making things right.  The FT-891 has a 3-year warranty, so give it a try, if you suffer from this issue, and care.

13.  USB port does not handle digital modes, but there is a work-around (see below)

14.  My rig maxes at 90-92w output.  See Radioaficion engineers link at end of this article, about that.

This review will cover every negative of the FT-891 I have noticed, but keep in mind that I feel it's a decent value, and the most performance you're going to find at this price-point. Some will want to tear this radio apart, because it's not the second coming of the FT-857, or because some test lab stats aren't absolute perfection, but in my experience, this radio is cheap way to get some decent performance.

Digital mode operators will want to avoid this rig, due to a clicking issue through CAT control, which I have also verified (see Youtube) and CW operators will want to seek more information elsewhere, as I am almost entirely an HF SSB guy. I will add that I have read this radio is not the best choice for digital modes, so you may want to research it.  Please note the caveat to #12 con, above.   Otherwise, I hope this exhaustive commentary proves useful.  I must add that I have also heard that using a Signalink keeps this clicking noise from happening.  I cannot verify if this is true, but you may want to see if there is any news on this front.

Now, for more on the radio... I'm running under the assumption that Yaesu is just not selling a lot of FT-891's. That is the only reason I can see for the price being so low. At the moment, you can get them for about $630-$680, shipped. That's in the same ballpark as their famous, yet older FT-450D, but the new FT-891 comes with extensive 32-bit digital noise reduction technology improvements found in their higher-end radios. True, the FT-891 has no internal tuner, while the FT-450D does, but with a resonant antenna or a strong external auto-tuner (which many supplement the 450D with, to run a wide-band antenna, anyway), the FT-891 is the more versatile rig. There are lots of little adds in the FT-891, including five record slots to save your CQ audio, so you can call CQ, or say whatever you like, with the press of a button.

Improvements in DSP over the FT-450D are huge. The noise reduction actually works very well, with less tweaking. It is a welcome change. Some may complain that Yaesu's implementation of DNR is a bit watery-sounding, but I find a little DSP SFT (shift), and proper RF/AF gain removes most of the bubbling. I like it.

Better on Rx than ICOM 7300?

I will say this without any bias -- I am shocked that the Yaesu DSP is easier to use, and in my opinion, better than that of my highly-touted Icom 7300. I own one, and am not alone in this.

Before purchase, I watched a video on YouTube, where Jerry Koch said he could pull out signals better with the FT-891, compared to the IC-7300. I rolled my eyes. I am an owner of the ICOM 7300, and ALC aggression issues aside, I love my 7300 for it's ability to pull out signals. I figured Jerry had lost it. I wanted to tell him off. How dare he? There is a $600 difference between these two radios, and the 7300 is the SDR radio that redefined the industry. I nearly posted a nasty comment, in the name of Sherwood, demanding he apologize for such a travesty!

Full stop.

I had viewed Jerry's video before I purchased the FT-891. Once I had the new Yaesu in the shack, I was able to experience the same. I was in a rag chew, and increasingly unable to copy a weak SSB signal fully on my 7300. I reached a point where no amount of Twin PBT, RX bandwidth filter adjustments, attenuation, and EQ'ing could produce better than 50% copy. Remembering Jerry's claim, I switched the antenna over to the FT-891, added a DSP level of 1, a little RF gain, and a slight shift, and -- boom. I understood the other op 100%. Dumbfounded, I switched back and forth between the two radios, and found the FT-891 was consistently better, given my noisy city environment. Although the 7300 tests as the more sensitive rig, it falls flat when overwhelmed by noise.

At my city noise levels, I find myself preferring the FT-891's noise reduction capabilities over the darling 7300, because whatever algorithm Yaesu uses is just far better. A tiny bit of DNR, and a bit of shifting, goes a long way. No to mention, the FT-891 includes a 3k roofing filter, which helps a great deal, in noisy environments. Does this make me want to stop using the 7300 at home, and enjoy the 891, instead?  I tried that for a week, and went back to the 7300 due to overall better sound, but for what it is, the 891 does a very good job.  What this experience did teach me is that I might dump the 7300 for a higher-end Yaesu rig, like the FTDX3000, or something else Yaesu, next year.

Will the FT-891 best the 7300, in all situations? No. The two radios are not in the same class, and I am only comparing them because I own both. On receive the two rigs are pretty similar, in 95% of situations, with the all-around sound quality edge handily going to the 7300. The FT-891 sounds kind of flat and lifeless. They both pull out the same signal, but the 7300 does sound better doing it, through either on-board, or 3rd-party speaker. That is to be expected, given that the FT-891 is only the size of a thick book. The FT-891, however, hits that sound range where the receive audio is most important to copy the signal. Great, for what it is. The 7300 has some deep-menu items (receive filtering and EQ) that give it an edge, at times (and others not), but this takes a lot of signal-dependent tweaking, and timely adjusting, to get there. Again, these are very different radios, but remember the price -- the FT-891 costs HALF!

A test with an on-air friend confirmed -- even though they are the same wattage, and the ICOM has a much better quality sound from its microphone, the FT-891 has what he described as, "more punch." That can be useful. I tested various levels of compression and mic gain, on both rigs. In short, the 7300 will almost always get "clean audio" reports, because ICOM forces aggressive ALC on you, but the FT-891 is capable of decent audio also, and a louder perceived signal, if you adjust it right. But, there are trade-offs. Don't be naughty. Follow proper adjustment procedures (you can mess your transmit audio up, if you don't follow the manual).

I added a Behringer xm8500 mic, and a homebrew patch cable, and my audio showed dramatic improvement -- but I eventually figured out good enough settings for the hand mic that I do not bother (see my other settings article on this blog). Please pay attention to the ALC, however. Keep it peaking at midpoint. Set it too high, and your signal will appear louder on the meter, but you might splatter.

I have purchased an E-bay seller W7YEN's amp cable for my FT-891 to connect to my Tokyo Hy-Power HL-1.2KFX, and was thrilled to find that it pushes the amp better than my ICOM 7300, also. Why? The 7300 is so strict with the ALC, that even at full 95 watts drive for the amp, the peaks are lower than with the Yaesu. The FT-891 pushes the amp to the max, at 85w drive, if I so desire. I have read that it is best to run an amp that works with 50w drive, because the FT-891 gets a little dirty on transmit. I amped mine to 700w+, and a JA OP nearby (I am 750 miles away, in Seoul) said my IMD distortion was about average, driving my Tokyo Hy-Power 1.2kfx amp excited by the FT-891, at 85w.  Any higher, and he saw IMD grow.  I can drive the amp just fine with 85w, anyway.  I religiously keep the ALC at half, or below.  A closer measurement would be an interesting comparison, but I plan this to be a portable rig, so I will rarely be amped.

I am getting better signal reports from people, after tweaking the stock MH-31 mic of the FT-891. I had to enter the menus and roll off the lows down below 300hz, and add a fair bit of emphasis to the mids and highs. I also find setting 1 on the back switch of the MH-31 mic is good for local rag chew, and setting 2 is better for distant DX.

The Backlash: Not an FT-857 Replacement

When the FT-891 came out, people expected it would be the replacement of the FT-857. It's not. The FT-891 has no UHF/VHF (a source of much disappointment, for those who want one radio to do everything). in addition, the FT-891 was found to lack important features expected of mobile, and SOTA-style rigs. Specifically, there is no read-out displaying voltage, other than briefly, at power-up. From that point, IDD amp current drain on the final stage transistors can be accessed via menu, but if there is another way to view voltage or overall current draw in amps, I haven't found it. Portable operators will want an external meter, and will find themselves dreaming that they could have been a fly on the wall when a table full of engineers in Japan decided these omissions would be acceptable. I can only surmise that not adding a real-time voltage display was on purpose. Perhaps they didn't want to take a bite out of more pricey FT-857 sales, or make the FT-817 look less appealing, in the downward sun cycle? I have no idea. If running from a desktop, you won't care, and you can always turn the rig on/off, if you need to see current voltage. It's an odd work-around.

Next, comes a very odd misnomer. The FT-891 is listed as eating 2 amps on receive, in Yaesu specifications. This scared away portable buyers, and was the source of many negative posts by hams who were waiting for an updated FT-857, yet had never actually tried the new radio. I have no idea why Yaesu claims this high number on receive, because they are incorrect (scroll to the bottom of this article, or search Youtube, for actual tested current draw numbers). The FT-891 listens comfortably at 1 amp.

Like it's predecessor it's not very efficient, if you want to transmit. The FT-891 can transmit at 5w, but as you'll see from statistics, you may as well be transmitting at 10w, or 15w, because you're really not saving much by running QRP.

Getting off track here -- I recently purchased an incredible Lifepo4 12.8v, 10Ah battery with massive 20amp current draw, and I'm in portable heaven with this rig. I can transmit at up to full power, with typical SSB RX/TX usage levels, for more than 3 hours -- no problem. I highly recommend dumping the old/heavy gel cell for a 10Ah Lifepo4. Mine is the size of a large coffee mug, and weighs just 1.1kgs (2.4 pounds).

I sold-off my Elecraft KX2 for this rig (and I loved that radio). I'm still happy doing so, because I have a lot more power available. With the downward sun cycle, having extra power on command is not such a bad thing!

Having full QRO power at my disposal while portable means I don't miss much, unless there is a big pileup, and I can use this rig as a back-up desktop machine, should I have the need.  My KX2 could fill those roles somewhat, but at 10w max output, it was a short dog peeing in the tall weeds.

ARRL and High IMD

A more recent source of negative talk about the FT-891 are regarding high IMD in the June 2017 QST test by the ARRL. I have seen online comments about these tests wrongly quoted by operators, who said the ARRL does not recommend the FT-891 as a desktop radio, which is untrue. They had a lot of nice things to say about the FT-891, but here's the worst of it...

To paraphrase, Bob Allison, WB1GCM, mentioned on page 55 of the June 2017 QST review, that the transmit phase is about the highest they've yet seen at the lab. He also said he would be wary of pairing this transceiver with an RF amplifier, and that users of the FT-891 should watch the ALC level when transmitting voice, because transmit IMD levels tend to get high if the ALC indicator reaches the top end of the scale. Likewise, keep the ALC level low, in digital modes.

To review, the suggestion by the ARRL was to keep the ALC set midrange, or below, but no higher, to mitigate the problem. I have also noticed that the FT-891 loses its lunch a bit, and transmits somewhat high peaks, when the ALC has to work in its higher range. Seeing that one of the first things an op should do is to properly set the ALC, for best performance, this doesn't bother me. I'm seeing fine results, keeping this in mind, along with lowering the mic gain from the stock setting of 50, to around 30, and the processing/compression level down to about 30.  I have noted ALC changes between bands, and mic may need adjustment on 40m.  I end up needing to raise the mic level for 40m, and lowering a bit for 20m, to stay in the first half of the ALC, with the stock mic.  I added an external Behringer XM8500, with homebrew patch cable, which is much more consistent.

There are additional tests found in the radioaficion link below. It sounds like, if you are wanting to amplify this radio, you may want an amp that makes its power at lower drive, for a cleaner signal. I suspect, however, that most buyers of this radio will not be adding an HF amp.

If small-footprint desktop operation is your interest, this is one cheap deal for a rig. What you're getting is the latest 32-bit DSP technology (found in the FTDX series), packed into a tiny box that outputs nearly 100w. I used to own an FT-950 (the larger brother of the FT-450D), and there is no comparison -- the FT-891 absolutely SMOKES the FT-950, in noise reduction, and probably overall receive in noisy areas, as a result. Online comparisons from owners of the 450D say the FT-891 is far better. In short, this is a DSP that truly works as DSP.

As mentioned, the FT-891 is a nice desktop space-saver. Reports are, than when controlled via its USB output, using updated/paid Ham Radio Deluxe (the free version doesn't work with it), the rig becomes as easy as pie to control. There were early complaints about the FT-891 having USB compatibility issues with certain programs, but this is not uncommon, and problems are often fixed through updates. Check with any 3rd party program providers for latest compatibility if your intent is working digital modes.

It was said in a YouTube video, that the smaller rigs receive some of the trickled-down improvements of the flagships in the same series. No doubt, this is what has happened with the FT-891. It's really like getting an FTDX1200 in a small box, at almost half of the price. It also boasts a much larger screen than the older Yaesu FT-857 (and don't forget, the FT-857 has suffered from screen issues, over time).

A Good Mobile Rig? Possibly.

I mentioned a few of the negatives of the FT-891. Let me mention a few more, and let you decide if it's a problem, given your usage. Like the FT-857, the FT-891 is a menu-heavy rig. It has been mentioned that this would be a difficult rig to use in a vehicle, while driving. If you were on the move, and hoping to adjust things like power level, or anything outside of your top 3 programmable quick-button menu choices, then yes -- it is difficult. The truth is, however, that taking the time to make changes on ANY rig, while driving, is dangerous (and may be illegal, in some states). It's much like texting behind the wheel. There isn't a lot of difference between the FT-891, and FT-857, in this regard. Band changes are done in a bit of a quirky way in the FT-891, but the method has grown on me. I find it not as bad as some have reviewed. Perhaps there was a firmware update improvement, but I don't find it "too fast" to jump to a selection, before you are finished, as some have complained.

From a desktop situation, however, given what you give up to enjoy the tiny footprint, I don't find the menus to be as horrible as some make them out to be. Hunting menus is never fun, but a long-press on the F button will take you back into the same area of the long-form menu, where you left off (essentially giving you a pseudo 4th quick button). The menus hide some very nice additions. For example, you can head to menu items 11-01 to 11-04 and find High and Low cut settings to tailor your receive audio -- nice for DX!  The back to default of menu items like RX bandwidth between band changes is a downer.  It does not keep this setting, which is annoying.

Yaesu's Sad Matching Tuner

Another thing to consider, is the choice of tuners. The FT-891 has NO internal tuner, and Yaesu doesn't give you a good choice for an automatic tuner. The FT-450D does offer a basic antenna matching (tuner) device. The FT-891 is a newer rig, and it will likely take time for companies such as LDG to come out with a dedicated 3rd-party tuner. You CAN use one of LDG's generic-model auto-tuners, however, and these will allow you to use tougher matches to antennas, such as the G5RV. See LDG's link to its list of compatible tuners, which I found in the text on the first page of their site. At the time of this writing, these include the Z-100 Plus, Z-11 Pro II, AT-100 PRO II, and AT-200 Pro II.  

** Note:  One op on Facebook's FT-891 Group claimed that he called LDG and confirmed his FT-857's matching YT-100 tuner works for the FT-891 also, but I cannot confirm that from anywhere else, and I suggest contacting LDG directly yourself, for the truth. They still do not list that as a compatible tuner for the FT-891.

Yaesu does sell its own tuner, matched for the radio, but I was left unimpressed. It's about the same size as the FT-891, but it's very pricey (well over $320). It only matches antennas up to 3.0 to 1, or better SWR, or thereabouts. That is NOT good enough for a G5RV on all bands.  What is the point of an external tuner so poor that it acts like a cheap internal?  Stupid.  It also clicks constantly as you tune, and pops up an annoying "WAIT" message on your FT-891, while you spin the dial. Search for YouTube videos showing it, to see what I'm talking about, then order an LDG model.  You can buy, or make an LDG cable that will interface, but it's not a requirement.

This is a radio that works best with an external tuner, but you can use a manual, such as an MFJ Versa Tuner (I do). Another ham gave me a great tip: Set the AM power output to something low, like 10 watts, and change over to AM for a tune-up on the band/frequency you want to use. Then switch back over to SSB, or whatever mode you are using. The FT-891's menus have a few different menu numbers to set power output using various modes. This is a bit confusing, but HF SSB PWR (16-01) is the SSB power output. Don't get it confused with HF PWR (16-03) which is actually something completely different (I think it's for digital power output). Don't ask me why -- it's odd.

Not a Great Digital Choice?

Another important mention, for digital ops. Although the FT-891 has a USB port, it does NOT have an internal sound card through USB.

* Update:  From AF5CC:
"The FT891 does digital VOX, so you buy the Yaesu CT-39A packet cable for $12, plug it into the DATA jack on the back, hook the other end to your soundcard, turn on the digital VOX, and you are done! When you go into data mode it will switch back and forth between RX and TX when you send and stop sending."
. Note, according to the ARRL, there may be phase noise issues, which mean you'd need to keep this rig below around 20w in digital use, or you (in theory) might mess with other operators in close proximity.  By reports I have read, it works great with FLDIGI.

On Panadapters and Earphone Jacks

It should also be noted that the FT-891 also has a panadapter. In truth, it is little more than a novelty, and not real-time unless the rig is silent. It may be useful in some situations, but don't buy the rig thinking you'll be using it much. You can set it to refresh itself every few seconds, but I find that's rather annoying. You can long-press the button and make it scan the band in real-time, but you lose sound while this is going on. Sound comes back when you exit the mode. The original big-brother FT-991 (non-A model) was the same way.

Lastly, the FT-891 has a small earphone plug output on its left side, which allows you to hear audio through headphones. It does work through both ears (although my rear speaker jack appears to be mono). There is a small adjustment switch behind the panel, which can change the front jack to either mono or stereo. Leave it on stereo, for best sound. Luckily, this semi-hidden front jack does not suffer from the HISS issues of the rear jack AS MUCH. Hopefully, Yaesu will work the problem out in future models, but it wasn't a deal-breaker for me, because the front jack works well enough.  If you listen at low volumes, avoid this rig, until (hopefully) updated.  

The Yaesu FT-891 is a steal of a rig, for the price. You're getting the newest technology from Yaesu, packed into a footprint slightly smaller than their dwarf powerhouse, the FT-857. True, you're giving up VHF/UHF, but we're living in a time when capable Chinese radios are $25, and low-end Yaesu VHF/UHF HT's are approaching $100. Sometimes it's actually nice to have a 2nd radio, so you can monitor everything, at the same time, so maybe it's not always best to have everything in one box? That's up to you, and your situation of use.

If you're interested in a new radio, at a bargain price-point, give the FT-891 a hard look.

As per accurate specs on power usage at transmit, and other engineering details, see this linked review:


Advanced FT-891 manual is here:


  1. Regarding turning down the monitor level in order to eliminate clicking.....The monitor level also adjusts the CW sidetone audio level and so if you turn it to 0 then you have no CW sidetone :(.

    1. I am not a CW guy, so am not familiar with the problem you are having. Did you try turning on the Noise Blanker?

  2. Actually I was referring to the clicking & chirping sounds which are associated with using CAT control with this transceiver. You can quiet the clicking & chirping sounds by turning the Monitor level down but that will turn down or mute the CW sidetone as well. Not good for CW ops.....

  3. Hello Derek, compliments on an a very informative review. I've had my 891 for about a year now and find as you do that it's a very capable package. I'm using it mainly on cw and digital psk/rtty(fsk/JT65/JT9/FT8 so perhaps I can help with some comments. I use the usb to the radio for CAT control and Yaesu's SCU-17 (single cable to the data port) for all the digital modes. Together they will work flawlessly all day with either WinTest, N1MM, Airlink Express, WSJTX etc. I use resonant antennas so the ATU aspect isn't a factor but I do use an Acom amp on CW and RTTY (FSK) and again the 891 drives it to with ease. I also concur with your current consumption assessment I used an inline current meter on the dc lead and it's way lower than published. A nice function especially in contests which isn't documented is setting up scan limits for section of the band so that the vfo loops end to end - great for S&P technique. I find it a great portable contest radio with a number of features which Yaesu have obviously included with that in mind. Maybe I'm just lucky but I don't hear any clicking or chirping when in CW mode, perhaps a faint buzz if I put on headphones and deliberately set the monitor level very high. In conclusion a great radio and keeper. 73 G0SBN

  4. 12. Bug info update, per Facebook 891 forum: "...many people have experienced the clicking [beeping?] when using CAT and a USB cable. It seems to be related to the Monitor function. You can eliminate the clicking by going to MON in the quick menu, and reducing the MON volume to zero. The clicking happens even if MON is not enabled. So, reduce the MON level even if you don't enable the Monitor function. (The 'fix' was discovered by a person on the Yahoo FT-891 group.)" - The noise is still there, even after MON is turned to 0.

  5. I bought this during the Christmas discount at HRO-Atlanta (BEST shipper in the business). Got the 20AH Life4Po battery, put it in a Red Oxx carry case, and the 891 in a Gator Case for wireless mic systems. Finally got a compatible tuner that is fast as they come: the MFJ-939Y. It takes its power from the transceiver via the mini-din cable. Put the tuner into a separate Red Oxx Lil Roy. Great system!

    1. Nice battery you got there! I have 10Ah, which is the size of a large coffee cup, but 15Ah or 20Ah would be a better choice.

  6. Great review Derek! I particularly appreciate your comparisons to the FT-857D (I own one and a FT-897D) and your real time A-B comarisons with the Icom 7300. One of the best observations you made about the 891 is that it is noise resistant and how well the 32 bit DSP works. Both of these features show that this is a very capable unit for mobile operations. I'm getting ready to install a Kenwood 480HX in my mobile after using the FT-857D and an AL500M amp with a Tarheel 100HP and having great results for 3 years or so. This 891 rig is a great value and I may have to sell the FT-857D and try the 891. Keep up the great work and I hope to catch you on the bands! Todd W3EME

    1. Thanks, Todd. Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you. Really appreciate your comments!

  7. I am in the market for a 100-watt rig for portable ops, and I mainly use digital modes. I have narrowed my 2 choices between the FT-891 and an Icom 7100. This article says digital ops should avoid this rig but apparently a lot are using the 891 with a Signalink, etc with no problems.

    1. Yes, I agree. If you want to use this for digital, go with the Signalink. I also have read rumors that Yaesu quietly fixed the problems with the clicking sound through port control (on newer 891 builds), but I cannot verify, as this is the only 891 I own. I have also read that they had to change the entire board to do it, but again, I cannot verify any truth.

  8. If low price is a deal breaker, then $569 makes this radio unbeatable. I bought it mainly as a travel radio for DXing on medium wave. The menu system is really not hard to learn or use, unless you are constantly switching modes and tweaking adjustments. I mainly use AM or LSB (default) and am fully satisfied with the audio readability. Sensitivity on medium wave is outstanding.

    1. It's a great deal, for the price. It's small enough that it becomes difficult to buy some of the full-featured QRP rigs out there (unless you need to sip power). The Lifepo4 batteries are so powerful, and portable, that you may as well go with this and have more watts at your disposal.

  9. Enjoyed reading this. Thanks for posting. I have an 891 but haven't put much time on it YET. 73 K0UC

  10. I love the FT-891 it's noise reduction is far superior to the IC-7300.

    For the Winter when I can't use the 891 portable much I installed a 2nd antenna to use with the 891, it's an EFHW from Hyendcompany.nl and use it as an armchair receiver when I can't be bothered to go upstairs to the shack, If watching some TV that I'm not that bothered with and I hear a nice contact I can just pounce on them there and then without having to leave the room.

    I can also use the 7300 remotely from the armchair but prefer to use an actual radio but I can compare the DNR directly and the 891 beats the 7300 hands down and the ability to completely eliminate all the miles of electric fence noise I have around me is a big plus, the 7300 struggles to eliminate heavy electric fence noise, with the 891, it's completely gone.

    I love the 7300, the screen is it's main feature, seeing the waterfall is nice but to be honest the DNR is so good on the 891 I'm half thinking of selling the 7300 for a FTDX-3000.

    By the way , I love to listen with headphones and yes, there is an annoying hiss of the 891 that is non existent on the 7300 but I believe there is a resistor mod to eliminate this , I must try it.

    I don't find the menus very annoying, most of them are set and forget anyway so they don't bother me and once familiar with the menus you need it's just fine.